صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني
[blocks in formation]

Mānadeva

{

259, expd., Kartt. 1138, Oct. Camb., Add. 1643.

259, Bhādrap

1139

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Wr. and Bh.-lal)

261 Pausa

1141

267 Māgha

1146-7

Paris, Burn. 104 V1, foll. 24-25a

[blocks in formation]

285 [expd.] Srā- 1165, July | Camb. Add. 1693

[blocks in formation]

Omitted by Wright and Bhagvanlal, though mentioned by Kirkpatrick. 'Monday, 10th October, 1138' (Jacobi).

As to this date, see the foregoing article,
page 1, note 5.

Vl f. 24b, Plate fig. 4, 5. I have supposed
this date to refer to the accession of
Ananda, though the passage is obscure.

See J.R.A.S. for 1888, p. 551.
Not purchased; full date transcribed :
284 Māgha śukla astamī ādityavāra.
Colophon copied (with mistakes) in Rāj
Mitra's Astas. Pref. p. xxiv, note.
Sunday, 8th July, 1165,' Kielhorn, Ind.
Ant. XVII, 249.

Full date (not given in R.A.S. Cat.): 286,
Phālguna sudi ekādaśyām ādityav.

Imperfect reading in Cat. supplemented
by a tracing from the MS. See the arti-
cle p. 7, note 7.

1 The date reads 186 māghakrsna divā daśamyā buddha [sic] dine. I suggested to Dr. Kielhorn (and he agrees), that divādané probably stands for dvādaśamyam tithau which gives 186 as an expired year (the usual solution for this era.) If however we interpret the date as meaning "on the tenth day," we have to take the rare solution (I. Ant. XVII. 252) of a current year, with the result (as Dr. Kielhorn informs me) Wednesday, 2nd February, 1065.

* Son of Sankaradeva, born Samvat 177, Āsādha. V2 foll. 306-31a.

3 No doubt identical with Mahendradeva the yuvaraj (जौराज) in Sivadeva's reign after whom the tank Mahendrasaras
was named. Vlfol. 246. See plate, fig. 4. The same Mahendra's birth is recorded in V2 as happening is sam, 199 (fol. 31a, where
Sīhadevaparameśvarasya putra is apparently an error for Sivado) See Plate, fig. 9. 1. 3.

4 Son of a 'Sihadeva' (possibly here Narasimha or Narendra) born in 219 Vaisakha. Va f. 316.

5 According to V8 (f. 316), born in 233, āśvina and likewise a son of "Sihadeva."

[subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

[ Ranaśūra]

3345 (No. 542

my Cat.)

[blocks in formation]

(336 [expd.] Pausa 1216, Jan.

342 Märga

[blocks in formation]

1221

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors]

Arimalladeva (8)

317 Vais

1197

Cat. p., 113

Cat. p., 83.

322 [expd.] Āsādha 1201 May

326 expd. Srāv. 1206, July- | Cat. p. 96

Aug.

Camb.

1648

Add.

...

[blocks in formation]

Not mentioned.

[blocks in formation]

Reading of Cat. verified by tracing from
MS.

Date retouched. 'It does not work out'
(H. J.)

Probably Thursday, 11th July 1196. See note in B.M. Cat. Sk. MSS. p. 230.

:

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[graphic]

3

17

15

[ocr errors]

:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

MS. 1320D. at
Kathmandu

Jayadeva

Jayabhīmadeva

...

380, expd. Caitra 1260 April... Tracing from 13, 3 mo.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

:

...

MS. (Pañca-rakṣā) not described by Pandit. Full date from my notes: 367 Phālguna Sukla ekadaśī ādityav. Sunday, 17th Feb., 1247. (H.J.) See J.R.A.S., 9191, p. 688. A copied date and, doubtless copied wrong; for Dr. Jacobi reports that the week-day works out wrong and nakşatra impossible. Monday, June 7th, 1255 (K), when Punarvasu was the Naksatra; see the article, p. 8, note 4. See the same note. Wednesday, April 2nd, 1260' (Sewell); see p. 9, note 1.

349

[ocr errors]

:

:

( The second form is taken from V2 fol.
35, where the birth of Jayaşīham. is
recorded (349, Vais.; father: Jagat-
anekamalla) just before that of
Anantamalla.

Tracing from MS. confirms reading of
Cat., but no week-day is decipher-
able.

In the Cat. we must read, as my tracing
shows, Ananta for Ananda; but Dr.
Kielhorn reports that the date does
not work out correctly.

1 Though no MSS. of this reign are extant, Someśvara is duly recorded by Kirkpatrick (reign 6 years 3 months) and in V2 (fol. 32a), where we learn that he was the son of Mahendra and born in 240 Phalguna sudi 13, Ma Māghanakşatra. If the following phrase राजा श्रस्त वष ५३ means that he reigned and died in (240 + 53) 293, it will not fit well with the ascertained date of Amrtadeva.

* According to V8, fol. 32b, Arimalla, son of Jayaśi [sic], Malladeva, was born 274, reigned 15 years (according to V1 25 years 10 months; but this does not suit with the other dates) and lived 62 years 10 months. This puts his death towards the end of 336, which our last date from MSS. will just allow.

Now a

(Plate: fig. 7. 1. 1) we read that in his reign the Probably there is something wrong in this last

3 Born 366, son of Rajadeva. He was apparently childless. For at 266 Yuvaraj (जौराज the usual form in the Chronicle) Jayādityadeva imprisoned his uterine brother, Jayānandadeva. Jayāditya, according to V8 (350), was the son of Jayabhima, and was born 358.

J. I.

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

statement. For it seems unlikely that Anantamalla should not only have superseded an older heir-apparent, but also have allowed him
to live on as heir-apparent to himself. Moreover, in V3 (366) we find mention of Jayabhima as rāja in 378 and Jayasimhamalladeva
(who seems to have actually succeeded him, according to V1 26a) as yuvaraj. This seems very strange if Jayāditya was alive all the
time. The statement of Wright may be correct in so far as it implies a divided kingdom in Ananta's time.

1 Jayarudra was the son of Jayatungamalla. Jayāri is called svakuțumba, a vague phrase for 'kinsman' perhaps. The full date
of his death (or of the suttee of his wives-the punctuation would allow of either interpretation) is 446, Āsādha purnami, V8 at 466
gives the same date, for the death (पस perhaps 'time up to which he remained in the world,' a common, expression in the
chronicle), not mentioning the suttee; but it makes two suspicious additions: (1) The addition of 'prathama' to the month, though
Āsādha was not intercalated; (2), the impossible allowance of 30 years 8 months to the king's reign.

2 Born 437, Phālguna krsna daśamī dhanesta [sic], brhaspati vāra; son of Jayānandadeva by a sangrahani bhāryā (V8, 456). The
tracing referred to in the last column was kindly sent me by Mahām. Haraprasad Sastri.

8 Son of Jayarajadeva and Rudramadevī, apparently (see p. 11, note) born in 467, Vais sudi 7. (Vl, f. 286; Plate fig. 8.) According
to V8 (606) he died in 502, Māgha badi 5. This may well be correct; for the date 504 given doubtfully in my Cambridge Cat., p. 119,
is much too uncertain to form a contrary argument. On re-examination I find the middle word looks more like cihna (not known as a
numeral word) than bindu. On the other hand, vīşuya - 5 is certain; so that Jayārjuna was alive in 500 or A.D. 1379-80.

« السابقةمتابعة »