صور الصفحة
النشر الإلكتروني

nephews of the Makhdüm Şāḥib, Khwāja Kalán Dānishmand was not married, and Khwāja Anwar died childless. Khwāja Nûr, the only surviving nephew of the Makhdūm şāḥib, married a Muhammadan Princess of Sonārgāon. Their descendants are the present Mutawallis. With the Sonārgāon Princess came a large number of persons, both Hindus and Muslims, who with the old survivals re-established the colony. The present inhabitants of Shāhzādpūr, are supposed to be their descendants. Shāhzadpār is divided into fourteen mahallas or sections, according to the origin, profession, or rank, etc., of the emigrants from Sonārgāon. The following are the mahallas :-(1) Haidarābād, (2) Qandahāri-pāļa, (3) Pathān-pāra, (4) Mihtar-pāra, (5) Mughalhāțţa, (6) Kāghazi-tola, (7) Qāzi-pāra, (8) Mullā-pāra, (9) Cuniakhāli. pāļa, (10) Katgar-pāra, (11) Mutia-pāța, (12) Dhari-pāļa, (13) Car-pāşa, (14) Andhār-kotha.

The place whence earth was dug, and into which lime was deposited, for the construction of the buildings, is called Cunia-khālī, and the pāșa, Cunia-khālī-pāra (or lime-tank-quarter). There was a jail or house of correction, where criminals used to be imprisoned and so called Åndbār-kothā or “Black Hole." Its traces can still be seen. From it the quarter takes its name.

4.-The Mosque. Area of the interior :-Length 51 ft. 9 in., breadth 31 ft. 5 in.; height 16 ft. 2 in.

Area of the exterior :-Length 62 ft. 9 in., breadth 41 ft. 3} in., height 19 ft. 10 in.

The wall is 5 ft. 7 in. thick. There are five door-ways, each measuring 7 ft. 5 in. in height by 6 ft. i in. in breadth. The utmost height. of the domes--15 in number—from the floor of the temple is 20 ft. 9 in. The mosque is built of bricks and lime of cowries. The edifice is supported by 28 pillars of black basalt, one of which is a little dissimilar from others in colour. It is pressed, contrary to the Islamic Law, by women to their bosom, praying for the birth of children. Their vows, it is supposed, are fulfilled.

Attached to the western inner wall of the masjid-on a platform, measuring 6 ft. 10 in. in length, 5 ft. 6 in. in breadth and 6 ft. 8 in. in height is constructed the mimbar or pulpit, 5 ft. 2 in. high, having the same length and breadth as the platform beneath. An arched staircase, with seven steps, is so constructed as to touch the pulpit.

There is a brick ängna or platform in front of the temple. The floor of the latter is higher than that of the former by one inch. On both sides of the platform-north and south-walls have been built, having an underground base of 4 ft. 6 in. The jambs of the doors are constructed of black basalt. Over the pulpit, and on the outer walls of the temple, are sculptured beautiful arabesques, consisting of foliage, fruits and other parts of the plant. Lengthwise on both sides of the walls there are half a dozen small false panellings made in plaster.

5.-The Waqf Estate. The Shāhzadpür mosque is endowed with 722 bighas of rent-free lands held direct from Government by trustees or mutawallīs--who are descended, as stated above, from Khwaja Shāh Núr and the Sonārgāon Princess. Of these lands only 15 khadas are set apart for the service of the temple. The remaining lands were given away to the original settlers, many of whose descendants still enjoy lākhirāj, madad-i-ma'āşh and other kinds of tenures!.

There is a piece of stone upon which are inscribed certain figures (Plate No. ) which I could not decipher.

6.-The Fair,


A mēlā or fair is held every year, close to the masjid-from the end of Cait to the beginning of Baisakh (April-May) which lasts for about a month. It is visited by Hindus and Muhammadans from far and

The offerings consist of rice, fowls, sugar, and sweets, also pices for the cirāghi, for the fulfilment of their desires. The molā is visited by about seven thousand people.

The species of the Bokhārā pigeons-given by Shāh Jalālu-d-Din Bokhāri and called after him Jalali ka būtar-still survive, and can be seen in the precincts of the Shāhzadpur mosque as well as in the neighbouring villages.

7.-Notes. The above is a complete review of the past traditions and the present state of the mosque and tombs of Shāhzādpār. The former raises the following issues : (1) Was Bengal colonized as long ago as the first century of th: Hijri Era by the Arabs ? (2) Who was the Makhdum şāhib and his followers ?

Shāhzādpūr of the present is not in many respects the Shāhzādpūr of the past. Yet it tells the tales of a distant and dismal past-by its mosque and tombs. The site of a bloody battle-field is indicated by the promiscuously buried remains of the martyrs. Despite its reclaimed marshes and dried-up swamps, we can reasonably picture a time, when the place was of an alluvial formation, fit for a petty trading colony. The Tsar-pu or Brahmaputra, the Indus and the Satlej, may be said to start from the same water-parting in the highlands of Central Asia. After receiving several tributaries from the confines of the Chinese Empire, and twisting round the lofty eastern Himalayan range, the Brahmaputra rolls down the Assam Valley. As the Indus with its feeder, the Satlej, and the Brahmaputra, convey to India the drainage from the northern slopes of the Himalayas, so the Ganges, with its tributary, the Jamuna, collects the rainfall from the southern or Indian slopes of the mountain-wall and pours it down upon the plains of Bengal.

1 Makhdūm Şāḥib was a Muhammadan prince, who came to Bengal ... and was allowed to colonize Yūsafshāhī, then an aninhabited jungle Four sharers now hold the land, each of whom is honoured with the affix of "Şahib,' while the Senior sharer is well-known as an influential zamindār,--Hunter's Statistical Account of Pabna, pp. 315-16.

It is a well-known fact that this part of Bengal is annually, during the rainy season, inundated, and the wide stretches of country around look like a vast ocean as the name of the river Harasāgar indicates.

In a remote period, we find that the whole ancient geography of India is obscured by changes in the courses of the rivers. Within historic times, many decayed or ruined cities attest the alteration in river beds. It is not, therefore, improbable that Arab coasting vessels came as far as the Gangetic Delta, and that Bengal was colonized in the first or second century of the Hijri Era by the Arabs. They, as also their predecessors, might have " followed the courses of the river." In 647 A.D only fifteen years or so after the death of the Prophet, Khalif 'Othmān sent a sea-expedition to Thana and Broach on the Bombay coast. Other raids towards Sindh occurred in 662 and 664. An Arab ship being seized, Muhammad b. Qāsim in 711 A.D. advanced into Sindh to claim damages, and settled himself in the Indus Valley.*

[ocr errors]

1 Vide Hunter's “ Indian Empire,” Ch. I.

& The Padma as well as the other rivers, in this part of Bengal, have undergone, during the life time of man, great changes. The Padma that flows in the Pabna District is subject to constant alluvian and delavian.

Dr. Hunter in the Statistical Account of Rangpur District, p. 162 says :Dr. Buchanan Hamilton wrote in 1809 that “ since the survey was made by Major Rennel (about 30 years ago) the rivers of the District (Rangpur) bave undergone such changes that, I find the utmost difficulty in tracing them."

8 Indian Empire, p. 42.
4 Indian Empire, p. 311.

The general information with respect to the trade of the Arabians with India is confirmed and illustrated by the Relation of a Voyage from the Persian Gulf towards the East, written by the Arabian merchant in 851 A.D., and explained by the Commentary of another Arabian, who had likewise visited the Eastern part of Asia. This voyage together with the observations of Abu-zaid-al-Hasan of Siraf, was published by M. Renondat in 1718. The Relation of the two Arab travellers is confirmed by Mas'udī, who himself visited India.

According to Dr. Buchanan," it is probable, indeed, that there were Muhammadans in this part (eastern) of Bengal, at a period long anterior to the conquest of the country by Bakhtyār Khilji in 1203. Başra merchants, it is a fact, carried on an extensive maritime com. merce with India and China, as early as the 8th century, and many of them settled in the countries they visited. Dr. William Robertson (Ancient India, p. 95) states that they were so numerous in Canton, that the Chinese Emperor (according to the Arab authors) permitted them to have a Qāzi of their own sect, who decided controversies among his country-men by their own laws, and presided in all the functions of religion. In other sea-ports proselytes were gained, and the Arabic language was spoken and understood. There is reason to believe, from this circumstance, that Bengal was the seat of a colony of Muhammadan merchants at this early period. This may be inferred from the extensive commerce it enjoyed with the countries of the West from early times. See J.A.S. Vol. XVI (1847) pp. 76-77.

Was Shāhzādpar-or rather Yūsufshābi-such a colony ? Was Makhdam Shāh Daula “ Shahid” at once the Vasco de Gama and the Clive of the expedition ? The tradition is told without regard for chronology. Native credulity has of course woven together exaggerated accounts.

The following biographical sketch of Mu'āzz-ibn Jabal whose son, it is said, came to Bengal, is taken from the Işābah (Biblio-theca Indica edition), Vol. III, page 872:

The progress of the Arabians extended far beyond the Gulf of Siam, the boundary of European navigation. They became acquainted with Sumatra and the other islands of the Indian Archipelago and advanced as far as Canton. Nor are these discoveries to be considered as the effect of the enterprising curiosity of individuals; they were owing to a regalar commerce carried on from the Persian Gulf with China and all the intermediate countries. In a short time they advanced far beyond the boundaries of ancient navigation and brought many of the most precious commodities of the East directly from the countries which produced them. They noticed the general use of silk among the Chinese. They are the first who mention the celebrated manufacture of porcelain. They describe the tea-tree, and the mode of using its leaves, and the great revenue which was levied from the consumption of tea-Extracted from Dr. William Robertson's " An Historical Disquisition Concerning Ancient India," Section III, pp. 93-96, and Note XXXVI,

p. 224.

I As with the Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish, and English, so with the Arabs of old, commerce was the first consideration that impelled them to seek adventures. Commerce was followed by colonizing zeal and missionary enterprise. Their long domiciliation in India led them to contract andesirable marriages with lowcaste native females, thus giving birth to a new race of Indo-Arabs, which produced slowly but surely, degeneration, deterioration and downfall.

J. 1. 35

“He was Abū 'Abdu-r-Raḥmān-al-Anşāri-al-Khizraji, an Imām of the Science of the Lawful and the Unlawful (Islāmic Law), and was present at the battle of Badr, at the age of 21. The Prophet (may God's blessing be upon him) deputed him to Yaman, gave him his blessings, permitted him to accept gifts and wrote thus to the people of Yaman: 'I send to you the best of us.' Mu'azz returned, during the Khilāfat of Abu Bakr, from Yaman. In his Huliya, Abū Noēm states that Mu'azz-ibn-Jabal was a leader of the lawyers, and a store-house for the scholars. He fought at Badr, Aqaba, and other battles. By his meekness, modesty, and liberality, he was the best of the young Anşārs. His body was symmetrical and he was handsome. Of him Ka'b-ibn-Malik says that he was handsome, brave, and the best specimen of his tribe. So says Al-Waqidi-that he was one of the handsomest men, took part in many battles. He recited several Hadithes from the Prophet, which have been quoted by Ibn-i-'Abbās, Ibn-i-'Omar, Ibn-iAbi Aufi-al-ash'arī, 'Abdu-r-Raḥmān-b-Samara, Jābir-b-Anas, and other tābi'in..

Mu'azz died in Syria (Shām) in 17 H. or according to many in 18 H., of Plague, at the age of 34."

I am not aware of what became of his children and grandchildren. It is probable that they emigrated to Mesopotamia or Transoxiana, as so many others had done.

Saiyid Jalālu-d-din Bokhāri,: during whose life-time the sea-expedi. tion, it is said, was undertaken, was born at Bokhārā, came to India, and became a disciple of Shaikh Bahāu-d-Din Zakariyā of Multān. The latter read Ņadith with Shaikh Kamālu-d-Dīn Muḥammad of Yaman, at Medina. It is a fact that Khwāja Qatbu-d-Din Bakhtyār Kāki, Khwāja Faridu-d-Din Ganj-i-Shakar, Khwāja Bahaū-d-Din Zakariyā of Multān (cousin of the former), Saiyid Jalāluddin Bokhārī, Lāl Shāh

1 One of his sons died in his life-time, when the Prophet wrote to him a very celebrated letter, which has been translated and paraphrased in Persian by: Shaikh 'Abdu-l-Haq Diblavī (958-1052 H.) and is to be found among his collected epistles and miscellaneous treatises, printed at the Majtabāi Press, Delhi.

% Saiyid Jalālu-d-Dīn Bokhārī came and settled at Uchh in the Multān Dis. trict, where he died. One of his grandsons was the famous Saiyid Jalalu-d-Dīn Husain Bokhārī, better known as Makhdūm-i-Jahāniyā. The latter was born at Uchh and died there in 785 H. · He visited Bokhārā, the birthplace of his grand. father.

The names of the Makhdūm Şāþib and of his nephews show that they must have been born in Iran, or Tūrān. They were rather known by their soubriquets than by their proper names.

[ocr errors]
« السابقةمتابعة »