Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, المجلد 72،الجزء 1 -المجلد 73،الجزء 1 |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 92
الصفحة 4
This , however , begins with N.S. 379 and the history would not seem to be treated on a strictly chronological basis , as the irregularity of order in the dates noticed in V2 is here more pronounced . The latest date , as already noted ...
This , however , begins with N.S. 379 and the history would not seem to be treated on a strictly chronological basis , as the irregularity of order in the dates noticed in V2 is here more pronounced . The latest date , as already noted ...
الصفحة 5
... nor can I concur in the description ' guptākṣara - likhitam . ' The form of k is distinctly post - Gupta ; and the general appearance of the writing with its closely placed aksaras seems to preclude the Sri - Harşa era .
... nor can I concur in the description ' guptākṣara - likhitam . ' The form of k is distinctly post - Gupta ; and the general appearance of the writing with its closely placed aksaras seems to preclude the Sri - Harşa era .
الصفحة 6
( referred to in the table ) of Vāmadeva makes my identification ( Journey , p . 9 ) more difficult . But the existence of Vāṇadeva's father , the king ( bhūnātha ) Yaśodeva , seems to be confirmed by the Tib . notices in J. Buddh .
( referred to in the table ) of Vāmadeva makes my identification ( Journey , p . 9 ) more difficult . But the existence of Vāṇadeva's father , the king ( bhūnātha ) Yaśodeva , seems to be confirmed by the Tib . notices in J. Buddh .
الصفحة 7
The years assigned by our MS . to his reign ( 8 ) seem to show the origin of the curious error in the length of the reign ( 80 years ) assigned by Kirkpatrick . Equally correctly given is the form Amṛta , which is now verified by a MS .
The years assigned by our MS . to his reign ( 8 ) seem to show the origin of the curious error in the length of the reign ( 80 years ) assigned by Kirkpatrick . Equally correctly given is the form Amṛta , which is now verified by a MS .
الصفحة 8
I formerly thought this date , which , as Dr Kielhorn kindly informs me , corresponds to 7th June 1255 , referred to the coronation of Jayabhīma , in spite of the punctuation , which seems not always trustworthy in this MS .
I formerly thought this date , which , as Dr Kielhorn kindly informs me , corresponds to 7th June 1255 , referred to the coronation of Jayabhīma , in spite of the punctuation , which seems not always trustworthy in this MS .
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
245 | |
254 | |
274 | |
289 | |
305 | |
362 | |
368 | |
379 | |
49 | |
57 | |
64 | |
75 | |
97 | |
108 | |
118 | |
178 | |
226 | |
227 | |
1 | |
16 | |
28 | |
62 | |
80 | |
94 | |
103 | |
109 | |
116 | |
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
according Akbar appears Babu Bahadur Bengal brother Çaka called cave coins collection contains copy correct Court death described Description Dēva Dictionary died district doubt Emperor fact Farrukhsiyar Fateh Shahi father feet further given gives Government grant hand head heart Husain Hutwa India inscription interesting issue Khan king known Lama language late Leaves letter Maharaja March means mentioned month Muḥammad Nature obtained original particulars pass Persian person Plate present Press Print probably Qutb-ul-mulk Raja Rajah received records referred reign remains remarks river Sahee Sanskrit says Sayyads seems seen sent Shah shows side Singh Sinha struck taken thou Tibetan took translation village visited written بي که