...(reviewer) requires that he leftm ef fopi Clement XlV. lie ihould be attentive to this, ^If a work is not worth the trouble of reading, it is better not 'to announce it at all, than torail at the writer. It-is illiberal to abufe a work merely to mak« the public merry at the expence...

...The good tafte of the Journalilt (Reviewer) requires that he fhould be attentive to this. If a work is not worth the trouble of reading, it is better...It is illiberal to abufe a work merely to make the Publid merry at the expence of the Author. It were to be wifhed that Rome would adopt the practice...

...good tafte of the Journaüll (Reviewer) requires that he flioald be at lenti ve to this. Ir a work is not worth the trouble of reading, it is better...announce it at all, than to rail at the writer. It il illiberal to àbufe a work merely to make the Public merry at thenpence of ths Anther. • It were...

...The good tafte of the Journalift (Reviewer) requires that he fhould be attentive to this. If a work is not worth the trouble of reading, it is better not to announce it at all, than to I mould have no idea of the ftate of literature in France, if Jt were not for the French Journals,...

...The good-taste of the Journalist (Reviewer) requires that he should be attentive to this. If a work is not worth the trouble of reading, it is better...all, than to rail at the writer. It is illiberal to abuse a work, merely to make the public merry at the expence of the author. It were to be wished that...

...ieqiiires that h; fliou'ii be attentive to thi». It a wetk is net vvotth th: trsubls of геэЛing, it is better not to announce it at all, than to rail ai the writer. It is illiberal to abule a work, merely to make the public merry at the ex pence of...