The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer

الغلاف الأمامي
William Irwin, Mark T. Conard, Aeon J. Skoble
Open Court Publishing, 2001 - 303 من الصفحات
Irwin (philosophy, King's College, PA) and his co-editors present 18 essays that look at the philosophical implications and underpinnings of the popular animated satire The Simpsons. Contributed by academics specializing in philosophy and literature, the essays explore the moral universe of the five major characters in the Simpsons (including a reflection on baby Maggie's silence as a protest against stifling society) and use situations on episodes of the show to look at a variety of philosophical questions, including the nature of hypocrisy, the sexual politics of the show, the example of neighborly love skewered by the depiction of Ned Flanders, and a Marxist critique of the show as being an opiate that distracts us from the true realities of capitalist evils. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com) -- Distributed by Syndetic Solutions, LLC.
 

الصفحات المحددة

المحتوى

Epigraph
Homer and Aristotle
Lisa and American Antiintellectualism
Sounds of Silence East and West
Marges Moral Motivation
On Nietzsche and the Virtues of Being
Worst Essay Ever
The Simpsons Meets the Crime Film
Springfield Hypocrisy
Mr Burns Satan and Happiness
Ned Flanders and Neighborly Love
The Heuristic Value of Homer
Chapter 16A Karl not Groucho Marxist in Springfield
Roland Barthes Watches The Simpsons
Chapter 18 What Bart Calls Thinking
Episode Titles

The Simpsons HyperIrony and the Meaning of Life
Simpsonian Sexual Politcs
A Kantian Perspective
Atomistic Politics and the Nuclear Family
Based on Ideas
Featuring the Voices
حقوق النشر

طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات

عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة

معلومات المراجع